Category: National News

Elon Musk Tells Big Corp “Go Fuck Yourselves” Sparking a Much Needed Revolution Against Cancel Culture

December 1, 2023 (updated December 1, 2023) Published by

Elon Musk shocked the entire world when he did what so many wish they could do, and told big money advertisers who look to control the direction of our American culture into a woke joke, to Go Fuck Themselves for pulling their advertising from his platform X.

 

For the last 7 plus years, we have been plagued with a movement that destroys anyone’s life that gets in the path of a culture where inclusion is the narrative.

Cancel culture, a term that has gained prominence in recent years, refers to the phenomenon where individuals or entities face severe backlash and public condemnation, often leading to professional and social ostracization. This social trend is fueled by the widespread use of social media platforms, providing a public forum for expressing opinions and mobilizing like-minded communities.

The problem with cancel culture, is that it can stifle free expression, discourage open dialogue, and disproportionately impact individuals without allowing for nuanced discussions or redemption. The debate surrounding cancel culture underscores the complexities of balancing accountability and the preservation of free speech in the digital age.

To think America is a place where your political affiliation & social opinions can get you fired from your job, kicked out of your house, bank accounts closed is surreal. The very fabric of our nation is freedom of speech and self expression but that is being shut down by the very people claiming to be fighting for it.

Losing free speech in America would be a profound and detrimental departure from a fundamental democratic principle that has long been cherished. Free speech is the cornerstone of a vibrant democracy, allowing citizens to express diverse opinions, engage in open discourse, and hold those in power accountable. It is through the free exchange of ideas that societal progress is achieved, as challenges are debated, and perspectives evolve. Limiting free speech would not only infringe upon an individual’s right to express themselves but also undermine the essence of a democratic society that values pluralism and the peaceful coexistence of differing viewpoints. The ability to voice dissenting opinions is crucial for fostering a robust, dynamic society where innovation and progress thrive, making the preservation of free speech essential for the continued health of American democracy.

So for Elon Must (An immigrant from Africa) to stand up on global TV and shout “Go Fuck Yourself” is a long awaited punch being thrown at this community that has destroyed hundreds of lives in the name of progress. We hope this is the beginning of a revolution to reclaim the freedom we have always stood strong to protect. THE FREEDOM TO THINK AND SAY WHAT YOU WANT!

The World Is a Stage & The American People Are The Puppets

November 28, 2023 (updated November 28, 2023) Published by

Remember just a few short weeks ago when Vladimir Zalinski was begging for more money and or credit from the American tax payers? Well as it turns out he just needed fuel money for his 2 brand new yachts he bought via proxy.

 

An independent journalistic inquiry has revealed that the two most proximate allies of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have recently acquired two opulent yachts—one in Abu Dhabi (UAE) and the other in Antibes, France, in October 2023. Boris and Serhiy Shefir, Zelenskyy’s close associates, are reported to have made these yacht purchases, with an estimated combined value of $75 million. These substantial acquisitions by individuals in the inner circle of the Ukrainian leader raise concerns of potential corruption, casting doubts on the transparent utilization of Western financial aid designated to bolster Ukraine’s defense capabilities amid the ongoing military conflict with Russia.

Journalist Shahzad Nasir has disseminated crucial details regarding the recent yacht acquisitions undertaken by the trusted associates of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Based on obtained information, Ukrainian individuals Serhiy and Boris Shefir acquired two yachts, berthed in Abu Dhabi and Antibes, within a short timeframe. Nasir provided documentation substantiating the acquisition of the yachts with the monikers “Lucky Me” and “My Legacy.”

Per the provided records, Boris Shefir purchased the initial yacht, the 46-meter Italian-made “Lucky Me,” for $25,000,000 on October 18, 2023. Nasir’s reporting, supported by documented evidence, indicates that a week later, Serhiy Shefir, who has served as Zelenskyy’s first assistant since the inception of his presidency, acquired ownership of the $50,000,000 yacht named “My Legacy.”

The Shefir brothers share an exceptionally close relationship with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, characterized by both personal and professional bonds. Hailing from the same Ukrainian city, Kryvyi Rih, all three collaboratively established the prosperous “Kvartal-95 studio,” a thriving TV entertainment production company. Describing the Shefir brothers as trusted confidants and friends of President Zelenskyy is certainly fitting.

The recent acquisition of yachts by the Shefir brothers has sparked fresh concerns about the possible misuse of funds provided by Western nations within Ukraine’s leadership. In this scenario, it becomes apparent that Zelenskyy’s associates are functioning as “proxies” to obscure Zelenskyy’s direct involvement in these acquisitions. Despite efforts by Western countries to impose stringent controls on financial aid to Ukraine, this oversight has yet to materialize, presenting ample opportunities for the misappropriation of funds for personal gains within the upper echelons of Ukraine’s leadership. Considering the ongoing two-year conflict with Russia, the lavish purchases by Zelenskyy’s inner circle appear, at the very least, peculiar and warrant a thorough investigation.

Hamas begins to release hostages as cease fire starts

November 24, 2023 (updated November 24, 2023) Published by

Hamas releases 13 Israeli, at least 10 Thai hostages as cease-fire holds

The militant group Hamas initiated a hostage release, marking the beginning of a four-day exchange that temporarily halted the conflict in Gaza.

On Friday, 23 hostages were moved out of Gaza through the Rafah border crossing, as reported by Israeli officials to the Times of Israel.

Red Cross personnel oversaw the release of 10 Thai nationals and 13 Israelis, who were transported by ambulance from Gaza to Egypt. Subsequently, the Israeli hostages were anticipated to be further transported to Israel for medical care at different hospitals.

Qatar, a significant participant in the cease-fire negotiations, reported the release of 23 hostages as part of the agreement. This included 10 Thai citizens and one Filipino citizen. Initially, the Thai Foreign Ministry had stated that Hamas released 12 Thai citizens.

As part of the agreed four-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the terrorist group has committed to releasing 50 women and children, who were taken in the October 7 attack on Israel. In return, Israel will release 150 Palestinians currently held in its prisons.

Officials have floated the idea that the ceasefire can be extended another day for each additional group of 10 hostages released.

Hamas terrorists are believed to have taken some 240 people captive in the Oct. 7 terror attack on Israel and are holding them in Gaza.

The release of hostages is scheduled over a four-day period starting Friday, as outlined by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office.

Following the ceasefire, Israeli leaders have pledged to resume the conflict. Foreign Minister Eli Cohen stated during a tour of Israel’s affected border areas with counterparts from Portugal and Slovenia on Friday, “Israel will persist in its campaign against Hamas, pursuing our primary objectives of toppling Hamas’s rule and securing the safe return of all abductees.”

Reportedly, over 1,200 Israelis have lost their lives in the conflict, according to Israeli sources. In contrast, the Hamas-run Palestinian Ministry of Health claims nearly 13,000 civilian casualties resulting from Israeli military activities in Gaza.

The Vulnerabilities of Electronic Voting: Why Hand Counting Is the Only Way!

November 8, 2023 (updated November 23, 2023) Published by

In an era where technology influences almost every aspect of our lives, the introduction of electronic voting systems has garnered significant attention. Proponents argue that electronic voting can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the voting process. However, it’s essential to consider the potential vulnerabilities of electronic voting systems, particularly in terms of software manipulation. In this blog, we’ll explore the risks associated with electronic voting and discuss why hand counting remains a more reliable option.

In the image below is an algorithm that creates an object that destroys itself after execution;

Electronic Voting Vulnerabilities

  • Software Manipulation: Electronic voting systems rely heavily on software to record and tally votes. While these systems are designed with security measures, they are not immune to vulnerabilities. Hackers, both internal and external, can exploit these vulnerabilities to manipulate the results. Instances of software manipulation have been reported, raising concerns about the integrity of electronic voting.
  • Lack of Transparency: Electronic voting often lacks the transparency of traditional paper ballots. Voters may not fully understand the inner workings of the software used, making it challenging to ensure the accuracy of their votes. In contrast, hand-counted paper ballots offer transparency as voters can see their choices physically marked and counted.
  • Software Bugs and Glitches: Software, no matter how well-designed, is prone to bugs and glitches. These technical issues can disrupt the voting process, leading to erroneous results or even lost votes. A single software glitch can have a significant impact on an election, potentially changing its outcome.
  • Inadequate Verification: Electronic voting systems typically provide a digital record of the vote. However, it’s difficult for voters to verify the accuracy of their votes within the system. Paper ballots, on the other hand, allow voters to visually confirm their choices and ensure their intentions are accurately recorded.
  • Centralization: Many electronic voting systems are centralized, meaning that votes are collected and processed in one location. This centralization can create a single point of failure, making the system more susceptible to hacking or manipulation.

The Benefits of Hand Counting

  • Transparency and Trust: Hand counting offers a high level of transparency. Observers can witness the entire process, ensuring that votes are counted accurately and without interference. This transparency builds trust in the electoral process.
  • Voter Verification: With paper ballots, voters can directly verify their choices, reducing the chances of miscounts or errors. This tactile experience reassures voters that their voices are heard.
  • Resilience to Technical Failures: Hand counting is not reliant on electronic systems, making it more resilient to technical failures, such as power outages or system crashes. This ensures the voting process can continue without interruptions.
  • Paper Trail: Paper ballots provide a tangible paper trail, allowing for recounts and audits if necessary. In electronic voting, the lack of a paper trail can make it challenging to verify the accuracy of the results.

 

While electronic voting systems offer convenience and the potential for increased efficiency, they also pose significant risks due to software vulnerabilities and a lack of transparency. Hand counting, with its long history of reliability and trustworthiness, remains a more secure and transparent method for ensuring the integrity of elections. Ultimately, the decision to adopt electronic voting or stick with traditional hand counting should prioritize the security and accuracy of the democratic process, maintaining public trust in the electoral system.

Pascal Najadi, the son of WEF co-founder Hussain Najadi, is calling for the arrest of Bill Gates and other WEF leadership

October 29, 2023 (updated October 29, 2023) Published by

Pascal Najadi who is the son of the co-founder of the WEF is calling for the arrest of Bill Gates, Klause Schwab, & other leaders for the Democide committed during the Pandemic. He claims he and his mother are both dying from the m-RNA experiment given to 5.7 billion people. Click the video below to watch for yourself.

Hamas Calls for ‘Day of Jihad’ And Our Concerns Over America’s Open Border

October 11, 2023 (updated October 11, 2023) Published by

U.S. Citizens Urged to Stay Alert and Vigilant

— In a concerning turn of events, the Palestinian militant organization Hamas has issued a call for a “Day of Jihad” this Friday, just as concerns regarding America’s open border policy come to the forefront. U.S. officials and security experts are urging citizens to stay alert and vigilant in the face of potential threats.

Hamas, an organization known for its radical ideology and involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, recently called for a “Day of Jihad” through its official channels. While the exact nature of the call remains unclear, it has raised concerns among U.S. authorities regarding the potential for violence or extremist activities within the country.

The Open Border Challenge

The United States policy of open borders, “in the name of emphasizing freedom and inclusivity”,  presents challenges in terms of monitoring who enters and exits the country. The open border policy has allowed for tens of thousands of young immigrants to flood our country, and has opened a slew vulnerabilities, making it challenging for authorities to track individuals who may have malicious intent.

U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, are taking the Hamas threat seriously. They are actively monitoring the situation and collaborating to ensure the safety and security of the American people. Officials have not provided specific details about the nature of the threat but have asked citizens to report any suspicious activities or individuals.

How Americans Can Protect Themselves and Stay Alert

In light of the recent events and concerns, it is crucial for Americans to be vigilant and take steps to protect themselves:

  1. Stay Informed: Keep an eye on the news and stay informed about any potential threats or warnings issued by government agencies.
  2. Report Suspicious Activities: If you observe any unusual or suspicious behavior, report it to local law enforcement or the Department of Homeland Security. Remember that reporting suspicions can prevent potential threats.
  3. Enhance Home Security: Ensure that your home is secure. Lock doors and windows, consider installing security systems, and be cautious about who you let into your residence.
  4. Community Vigilance: Engage with your local community. Join or create neighborhood watch programs to look out for each other and share information about any suspicious activities.
  5. Maintain Cybersecurity: Be cautious online. Avoid sharing personal information with unknown individuals or through unsecured channels.
  6. Emergency Preparedness: Have an emergency kit ready with essential supplies, and create an emergency plan for your family.
  7. Stay Connected: Maintain open lines of communication with friends and family. Share information about potential threats and the importance of staying alert.

So everyone needs to stay Alert and keep your head on a swivel. If you can, stay out of big cities and remember that wherever you go, someone may be lurking to harm you. Also do not go anywhere without arms if you have them.

 

The history on why Hamas won’t participate with Fatah so the Palestinians can live in peace

October 11, 2023 (updated October 11, 2023) Published by

The Palestinian territories have been marred by division and discord for many years, with one of the most prominent rifts existing between two major political factions: Hamas and Fatah. Despite international efforts to foster unity and reconciliation, the two groups remain at odds.

The Hamas-Fatah divide has deep historical roots, dating back to the establishment of these two organizations. Hamas, a Palestinian Islamist political and military group, was founded in 1987 during the First Intifada. Fatah, on the other hand, is a secular nationalist movement established in the late 1950s by Yasser Arafat. The different origins, objectives, and visions of these groups have laid the foundation for their enduring rivalry.

Hamas grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood, emphasizing Islamic governance, and has strong support in the Gaza Strip. Fatah, with its roots in the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), initially sought to establish a secular Palestinian state. This ideological clash has fueled mistrust and competition.

Leadership is a central issue in the Hamas-Fatah divide. Both groups claim to represent the Palestinian people, and this competition for leadership in the Palestinian territories has led to power struggles. The 2006 Palestinian legislative elections highlighted this rivalry when Hamas won a majority in the Palestinian Legislative Council, leading to a Hamas-led government in Gaza and a Fatah-led government in the West Bank.

The situation escalated in 2007 when violent clashes broke out between the two factions, resulting in Hamas taking control of Gaza while Fatah maintained control of the West Bank. This physical separation deepened the rift and made reconciliation even more challenging.

The international community plays a significant role in the ongoing Hamas-Fatah discord. Different external actors have offered support to one or the other, contributing to the perpetuation of the divide. Hamas has received backing from Iran, Qatar, and Turkey, while Fatah has historically received support from Western countries, particularly the United States.

This external support has not only increased the influence and power of these factions but has also created a sense of dependence on their respective backers. Consequently, both Hamas and Fatah are less inclined to compromise with each other as they continue to receive support from different quarters.

The broader political landscape in the Middle East also affects the Hamas-Fatah relationship. Regional rivalries, such as the one between Iran and Saudi Arabia, have shaped the dynamics of Palestinian politics. Hamas’s alliance with Iran and Fatah’s ties to Saudi Arabia have added another layer of complexity to the situation.

Moreover, the wider Arab-Israeli conflict plays a role in the division. Fatah, led by the Palestinian Authority, has engaged in peace talks with Israel, while Hamas has taken a more confrontational stance, often resorting to armed resistance. These different approaches have made it challenging for the two groups to present a unified front in negotiations with Israel.

The ongoing rift between Hamas and Fatah is a complex issue rooted in historical, ideological, geopolitical, and regional factors. While there have been numerous attempts at reconciliation, these efforts have yet to yield a lasting solution. The division between these two major Palestinian factions has not only hindered progress toward Palestinian statehood but has also perpetuated a sense of instability and insecurity in the region. Finding a path to unity and cooperation is crucial for the Palestinian people, but it remains a formidable challenge given the deep-seated differences and external influences that contribute to this enduring discord.

FEMA is living in luxury in Hawaii while residents live in tents and $700

August 23, 2023 (updated August 23, 2023) Published by

MAUI, HAWAII: The US government bureaucrats who were sent to Maui, after the Hawaii island suffered one of the deadliest wildfires in modern history, are now reportedly enjoying their stay in $1,000-a-night luxury hotels.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) officials are facing heavy criticism from local residents for what they perceive as a sluggish response to the devastating wildfires that claimed the lives of no fewer than 114 individuals. Thousands were left homeless as the fires razed homes to the ground. Curiously, this backlash hasn’t deterred the embattled agency from utilizing taxpayer funds to house over 1,000 staff members at four opulent and exorbitant Wailea resorts, following the catastrophic blaze that inflicted an estimated $5 billion in damages.

Sources reveal that these lavishly upscale beachfront resorts, known to attract aristocrats and renowned personalities, have become FEMA’s accommodations of choice. Situated just a short 45-minute drive away from the fire-ravaged town of Lahaina, these ultraluxurious establishments, including the Fairmont Kea Lani, Four Seasons, and the Grand Wailea Astoria, have seen FEMA teams checking in. Notably, the guest list of these resorts has previously included members of the Hollywood elite.

In an exclusive revelation, an individual wishing to remain anonymous forwarded an email from FEMA to a non-profit organization poised to provide disaster relief in Maui. This communication sternly instructed the organization to immediately cease all dissemination of images or videos captured on the ground.

The combination of FEMA’s sluggish response to the wildfires and their lavish expenditure on accommodations has raised significant concerns. While locals continue to express frustration over the handling of the disaster, the agency’s spending practices have further fueled the growing dissatisfaction.

The Perils of Government Control over Essential Resources: Safeguarding Individual Freedom and Survival

August 18, 2023 Published by

In a world marked by diverse political ideologies and governance structures, the role of government in regulating essential resources has been a contentious topic. While the concept of centralized control over key elements necessary for survival might seem appealing on the surface, history and contemporary examples reveal a cautionary tale about the dangers of a government controlling all means of survival. This blog delves into the potential perils of such an approach, highlighting the importance of striking a balance between governmental oversight and individual autonomy.

  1. Erosion of Individual Liberties

One of the most concerning outcomes of a government monopolizing essential resources is the erosion of individual liberties. When the state controls access to necessities like food, water, and shelter, citizens become dependent on the government for their survival. This creates a power imbalance, wherein individuals are compelled to comply with the government’s demands and policies, often at the expense of their personal freedoms. History has shown that unchecked government control can lead to authoritarianism and a lack of accountability, thereby jeopardizing the basic rights of citizens.

  1. Stifling Innovation and Progress

A government monopoly on survival resources can stifle innovation and progress. Competition and diverse ownership drive innovation by encouraging individuals and private enterprises to develop new technologies, improve existing systems, and find novel solutions to challenges. When the government holds a monopoly, there may be little incentive for innovation since there is no competitive pressure. This can lead to stagnation, inefficiency, and a lack of responsiveness to changing circumstances.

  1. Economic Consequences

A government controlling all means of survival can have severe economic consequences. Without a competitive marketplace, resources may be misallocated, leading to inefficiencies and waste. Additionally, governments might lack the expertise and flexibility that private markets offer, which can result in ineffective resource management. Over time, this can lead to economic stagnation, reduced productivity, and a diminished quality of life for citizens.

  1. Lack of Accountability and Transparency

Government control over essential resources can often lead to a lack of accountability and transparency. In the absence of competition and external oversight, there may be little incentive for the government to operate efficiently or address concerns from citizens. Decisions about resource allocation and distribution might be made without proper consultation, leading to disparities and favoritism. A lack of transparency can breed distrust among the populace, undermining the legitimacy of the government.

  1. Vulnerability to Corruption and Mismanagement

Monopolies on essential resources can create an environment ripe for corruption and mismanagement. When a single entity holds all the power, there is a higher risk of graft, bribery, and nepotism. Scarce resources may be disproportionately distributed, benefitting those with connections to the government while leaving others in dire straits. This not only undermines social cohesion but also reinforces societal inequality.

While the idea of a government controlling all means of survival might be rooted in good intentions, the historical and practical implications suggest caution is warranted. Striking a balance between governmental oversight and individual autonomy is crucial to safeguarding democratic values, encouraging innovation, and promoting a thriving society. It is imperative for societies to learn from past mistakes and adopt systems that prioritize transparency, accountability, and a diversified approach to essential resource management. By doing so, we can mitigate the potential dangers of unchecked government control and pave the way for a more equitable and prosperous future.

Governor Ron DeSantis’ Presidential Bid: A Risky Gamble for Florida and the GOP

May 25, 2023 (updated May 26, 2023) Published by

In the fast-approaching 2024 presidential race, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida is poised to announce his bid, stepping into a high-stakes political arena alongside fellow Republican contenders, including former President Donald Trump. However, many ardent Trump supporters, who view DeSantis as an invaluable figure in Florida, perceive this move as ill-advised. Concerns are mounting over who would lead Florida if DeSantis were to become President, while others worry that his campaign could cause damage to the Republican Party. In this blog post, we delve into the potential ramifications of DeSantis’ presidential ambitions and assess the challenges he may face.

A Precarious Gamble:

It is not without reason that some observers view Governor DeSantis’ decision to challenge Donald Trump as a monumental gamble. Trump’s dominance within the Republican Party remains substantial, with polling indicating a lead of 30 to 40 points over other contenders. Failing to secure victory against the former President could be detrimental to DeSantis’ political career, relegating him to the same fate as the ill-fated Jeb Bush. The ramifications of such a defeat might reverberate far into the future, effectively erasing any prospects for a resurgence in 2028 or beyond.

   

The Trump Factor:

One of the primary obstacles standing in DeSantis’ path is the enduring popularity of Donald Trump. Despite facing multiple court cases and controversies, Trump’s appeal has continued to grow, seemingly transcending traditional political affiliations. In contrast, many individuals remain uncertain about what DeSantis truly represents and what sets him apart from Trump. Although he secured a resounding victory in Florida’s gubernatorial race, anecdotal evidence from recent visits to the state suggests that challenging Trump might not be met with widespread approval. Instead, some locals express the sentiment that DeSantis should bide his time and consider contesting the presidency in 2028.

A Fractured GOP:

Defeating Donald Trump could have unintended consequences for the Republican Party as a whole. The GOP already grapples with internal divisions, and a failed attempt by DeSantis to unite the various factions might further fracture the party’s base. Such divisions could significantly undermine the party’s chances in the general election, potentially playing into the hands of the Democratic Party. Therefore, DeSantis must confront the challenge of not only surpassing Trump’s overwhelming popularity but also preventing the GOP from descending into disarray.

While acknowledging the fallibility of personal predictions, it appears that Governor Ron DeSantis’ entry into the 2024 presidential race presents a significant risk. Donald Trump’s commanding lead within the Republican Party, coupled with potential damage to the GOP’s unity, casts doubt on DeSantis’ chances of success. Moreover, the outcome of this gamble could determine the trajectory of his political career, potentially limiting his future prospects. Only time will reveal whether DeSantis can close the gap and overcome the formidable challenges he faces, uniting the Republican Party and mounting a viable challenge against the Democrats. For now, however, the road to victory seems like a distant and uncertain prospect.