Hamas begins to release hostages as cease fire starts

Hamas releases 13 Israeli, at least 10 Thai hostages as cease-fire holds

The militant group Hamas initiated a hostage release, marking the beginning of a four-day exchange that temporarily halted the conflict in Gaza.

On Friday, 23 hostages were moved out of Gaza through the Rafah border crossing, as reported by Israeli officials to the Times of Israel.

Red Cross personnel oversaw the release of 10 Thai nationals and 13 Israelis, who were transported by ambulance from Gaza to Egypt. Subsequently, the Israeli hostages were anticipated to be further transported to Israel for medical care at different hospitals.

Qatar, a significant participant in the cease-fire negotiations, reported the release of 23 hostages as part of the agreement. This included 10 Thai citizens and one Filipino citizen. Initially, the Thai Foreign Ministry had stated that Hamas released 12 Thai citizens.

As part of the agreed four-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the terrorist group has committed to releasing 50 women and children, who were taken in the October 7 attack on Israel. In return, Israel will release 150 Palestinians currently held in its prisons.

Officials have floated the idea that the ceasefire can be extended another day for each additional group of 10 hostages released.

Hamas terrorists are believed to have taken some 240 people captive in the Oct. 7 terror attack on Israel and are holding them in Gaza.

The release of hostages is scheduled over a four-day period starting Friday, as outlined by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office.

Following the ceasefire, Israeli leaders have pledged to resume the conflict. Foreign Minister Eli Cohen stated during a tour of Israel’s affected border areas with counterparts from Portugal and Slovenia on Friday, “Israel will persist in its campaign against Hamas, pursuing our primary objectives of toppling Hamas’s rule and securing the safe return of all abductees.”

Reportedly, over 1,200 Israelis have lost their lives in the conflict, according to Israeli sources. In contrast, the Hamas-run Palestinian Ministry of Health claims nearly 13,000 civilian casualties resulting from Israeli military activities in Gaza.

The Vulnerabilities of Electronic Voting: Why Hand Counting Is the Only Way!

In an era where technology influences almost every aspect of our lives, the introduction of electronic voting systems has garnered significant attention. Proponents argue that electronic voting can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the voting process. However, it’s essential to consider the potential vulnerabilities of electronic voting systems, particularly in terms of software manipulation. In this blog, we’ll explore the risks associated with electronic voting and discuss why hand counting remains a more reliable option.

In the image below is an algorithm that creates an object that destroys itself after execution;

Electronic Voting Vulnerabilities

  • Software Manipulation: Electronic voting systems rely heavily on software to record and tally votes. While these systems are designed with security measures, they are not immune to vulnerabilities. Hackers, both internal and external, can exploit these vulnerabilities to manipulate the results. Instances of software manipulation have been reported, raising concerns about the integrity of electronic voting.
  • Lack of Transparency: Electronic voting often lacks the transparency of traditional paper ballots. Voters may not fully understand the inner workings of the software used, making it challenging to ensure the accuracy of their votes. In contrast, hand-counted paper ballots offer transparency as voters can see their choices physically marked and counted.
  • Software Bugs and Glitches: Software, no matter how well-designed, is prone to bugs and glitches. These technical issues can disrupt the voting process, leading to erroneous results or even lost votes. A single software glitch can have a significant impact on an election, potentially changing its outcome.
  • Inadequate Verification: Electronic voting systems typically provide a digital record of the vote. However, it’s difficult for voters to verify the accuracy of their votes within the system. Paper ballots, on the other hand, allow voters to visually confirm their choices and ensure their intentions are accurately recorded.
  • Centralization: Many electronic voting systems are centralized, meaning that votes are collected and processed in one location. This centralization can create a single point of failure, making the system more susceptible to hacking or manipulation.

The Benefits of Hand Counting

  • Transparency and Trust: Hand counting offers a high level of transparency. Observers can witness the entire process, ensuring that votes are counted accurately and without interference. This transparency builds trust in the electoral process.
  • Voter Verification: With paper ballots, voters can directly verify their choices, reducing the chances of miscounts or errors. This tactile experience reassures voters that their voices are heard.
  • Resilience to Technical Failures: Hand counting is not reliant on electronic systems, making it more resilient to technical failures, such as power outages or system crashes. This ensures the voting process can continue without interruptions.
  • Paper Trail: Paper ballots provide a tangible paper trail, allowing for recounts and audits if necessary. In electronic voting, the lack of a paper trail can make it challenging to verify the accuracy of the results.

 

While electronic voting systems offer convenience and the potential for increased efficiency, they also pose significant risks due to software vulnerabilities and a lack of transparency. Hand counting, with its long history of reliability and trustworthiness, remains a more secure and transparent method for ensuring the integrity of elections. Ultimately, the decision to adopt electronic voting or stick with traditional hand counting should prioritize the security and accuracy of the democratic process, maintaining public trust in the electoral system.

Disturbing Video Captures Fatal Confrontation Between Neighbors in Brooklyn Apartment Hallway

A shocking video has emerged, revealing a chilling incident in which a neighbor violently attacked a father and his stepson in a Brooklyn apartment hallway during a heated argument over noise. The incident unfolded on a Sunday night.

The distressing footage, obtained by The Post, commences with a man cloaked in black, pacing agitatedly outside the apartment of his upstairs neighbors on the fourth floor of 1418 Brooklyn Ave. This apartment building is located in the well-known East Flatbush housing complex, where notable figures such as Barbra Streisand and Michael K. Williams once called home.

A woman soon emerges from the apartment, engaging in a verbal exchange with the agitated neighbor, who was later identified by law enforcement as Jason Pass, 47 years of age.

Not long after, the woman is joined by her son, identified by police as 27-year-old Chinwai Mode. Regrettably, the video lacks audio, leaving us in the dark about the content of their exchange.

Moments later, Mode’s stepfather, Bladimy Mathurin, a 47-year-old school bus driver, exits the apartment, wielding a pair of scissors, and confronts the infuriated neighbor in the video.

Despite his wife’s efforts to intervene, the muscular father of four pushes her aside. It is at this intense moment that the verbal altercation takes a harrowing turn when the neighbor in black produces a handgun and directs it menacingly at Mathurin.

Below is the full video, but we must warn you that this is very graphic and if you’re sensitive at all, do not watch.

 

The Science Community fueled by the elites endless lust for power is destroying the world, not you!

We’re in peril times and there is one class that is at fault, and they’re flying under the radar while people like you and I are blamed and punished for it through regulation & taxes. And if you directly attack it, it will protect itself as it does in the image below where I asked AI to do a simple task.

Although all the things you have in the world that are considered good for humanity, you have to consider the trade off & that is the negative things we are witnessing today. Everything from cars, trains, planes, & your cell phone are from the work of a scientist. But Guns, Bombs, Drugs, GMO’s, Global Warming & even viruses like COVID-19 are also the work of a scientist. Add to that growing list “AI ” that very well could be the end of humanity.

At what point to we start to admit that we don’t have enough oversite on this community?

Sure, scientist are not bad people in the eyes of society, but what they do for money behind closed doors would certainly have you disgusted.

Let’s talk about the biggest elephant in the room right now with the explosion of mental health, obesity & gender dysphoria. Again I turn to science biggest tool right now “AI” and of course this is the result;

Yup, denied to attack itself once again!

But lets be honest, everywhere you look today you see our youth suffering severe mental health issues like this young man seen here in the video below, where he believes he is a dog, and we enable him rather than researching why he has such a condition and treating him if even possible, so other children are not born with this condition.

Or let’s take this next video showing a transgender “male” recording everywhere he goes in public looking for people to “mis-gender” him so he can gain views on his social media accounts.

Science says there are 57 genders including non-binary. But the fact is that nature has only 2 that create life, and 57 mutations that could be caused by chemicals in our foods, along with altering genetic codes in our plants that we consume.

Why is the community not digging as deep as we can to find the source for this human crisis? PROFITS! that’s why. In a world where capitalism and greed are the main drivers, if you even dare to point the magnifying glass in their direction, your career is over and even possibly your life.

Let me know in the comments, what you think it will take to get our community’s to start asking why this is happening, & start holding the real people to the fire to fix it.

COVID is back, or at least they want you to fear that it is:

Alex Jones “The Conspiracy Theorist” announced 3 weeks ago (middle of August 2023), that he had a very creditable informant telling him that we are going to be back in full covid crisis by middle of September. This set the internet ablaze with the usual horns telling everyone, this is just a conspiracy.

Fast forward to today (9/7/2023) and COVID is ramping up with Jill Biden supposedly contracting it, even though she is fully vaccinated and boosted. So Alex appears to have been right that they are going to push the fear and chaos with the disease.

So I figured I would write about it to remind everyone how those screaming run, were wrong and the damage they caused the economy doing so.

The emergence of COVID-19 in late 2019 sent shockwaves across the globe. As the virus spread rapidly from its epicenter in Wuhan, China, to various corners of the world, fear gripped communities and governments alike. The early days of the pandemic were marked by uncertainty, misinformation, and panic. One of the most alarming aspects of this period was the fear-driven narrative that hospitals would be overwhelmed by a surge of patients. In this blog, we’ll explore how the beginning of COVID-19 was indeed fear-driven, and we’ll examine why, in many places, emergency beds never filled up as initially feared.

When COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020, fear quickly took hold. Media coverage of overwhelmed hospitals in Italy and other hard-hit areas added to the sense of impending crisis. People began to envision a scenario in which hospitals around the world would be inundated with patients, creating a healthcare catastrophe of unprecedented proportions.

Fear was amplified by the lack of knowledge about the virus and its transmission, the absence of a vaccine or effective treatment, and the grim reports of high mortality rates, especially among the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. This fear-driven environment led to panic buying, lockdowns, and strained healthcare systems as everyone sought to prepare for the worst.

Flattening the Curve

In response to these fears, governments implemented strict measures to “flatten the curve.” Lockdowns, social distancing, mask mandates, and travel restrictions were enforced to slow the spread of the virus and prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed. The goal was to reduce the peak number of cases, ensuring that hospitals had enough capacity to treat patients without reaching a breaking point.

As the pandemic progressed, it became evident that while some hospitals in heavily affected regions did face significant challenges, the initial fear of a global healthcare collapse did not materialize.


Peoplez Newz

 

FEMA is living in luxury in Hawaii while residents live in tents and $700

MAUI, HAWAII: The US government bureaucrats who were sent to Maui, after the Hawaii island suffered one of the deadliest wildfires in modern history, are now reportedly enjoying their stay in $1,000-a-night luxury hotels.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) officials are facing heavy criticism from local residents for what they perceive as a sluggish response to the devastating wildfires that claimed the lives of no fewer than 114 individuals. Thousands were left homeless as the fires razed homes to the ground. Curiously, this backlash hasn’t deterred the embattled agency from utilizing taxpayer funds to house over 1,000 staff members at four opulent and exorbitant Wailea resorts, following the catastrophic blaze that inflicted an estimated $5 billion in damages.

Sources reveal that these lavishly upscale beachfront resorts, known to attract aristocrats and renowned personalities, have become FEMA’s accommodations of choice. Situated just a short 45-minute drive away from the fire-ravaged town of Lahaina, these ultraluxurious establishments, including the Fairmont Kea Lani, Four Seasons, and the Grand Wailea Astoria, have seen FEMA teams checking in. Notably, the guest list of these resorts has previously included members of the Hollywood elite.

In an exclusive revelation, an individual wishing to remain anonymous forwarded an email from FEMA to a non-profit organization poised to provide disaster relief in Maui. This communication sternly instructed the organization to immediately cease all dissemination of images or videos captured on the ground.

The combination of FEMA’s sluggish response to the wildfires and their lavish expenditure on accommodations has raised significant concerns. While locals continue to express frustration over the handling of the disaster, the agency’s spending practices have further fueled the growing dissatisfaction.

The Perils of Government Control over Essential Resources: Safeguarding Individual Freedom and Survival

In a world marked by diverse political ideologies and governance structures, the role of government in regulating essential resources has been a contentious topic. While the concept of centralized control over key elements necessary for survival might seem appealing on the surface, history and contemporary examples reveal a cautionary tale about the dangers of a government controlling all means of survival. This blog delves into the potential perils of such an approach, highlighting the importance of striking a balance between governmental oversight and individual autonomy.

  1. Erosion of Individual Liberties

One of the most concerning outcomes of a government monopolizing essential resources is the erosion of individual liberties. When the state controls access to necessities like food, water, and shelter, citizens become dependent on the government for their survival. This creates a power imbalance, wherein individuals are compelled to comply with the government’s demands and policies, often at the expense of their personal freedoms. History has shown that unchecked government control can lead to authoritarianism and a lack of accountability, thereby jeopardizing the basic rights of citizens.

  1. Stifling Innovation and Progress

A government monopoly on survival resources can stifle innovation and progress. Competition and diverse ownership drive innovation by encouraging individuals and private enterprises to develop new technologies, improve existing systems, and find novel solutions to challenges. When the government holds a monopoly, there may be little incentive for innovation since there is no competitive pressure. This can lead to stagnation, inefficiency, and a lack of responsiveness to changing circumstances.

  1. Economic Consequences

A government controlling all means of survival can have severe economic consequences. Without a competitive marketplace, resources may be misallocated, leading to inefficiencies and waste. Additionally, governments might lack the expertise and flexibility that private markets offer, which can result in ineffective resource management. Over time, this can lead to economic stagnation, reduced productivity, and a diminished quality of life for citizens.

  1. Lack of Accountability and Transparency

Government control over essential resources can often lead to a lack of accountability and transparency. In the absence of competition and external oversight, there may be little incentive for the government to operate efficiently or address concerns from citizens. Decisions about resource allocation and distribution might be made without proper consultation, leading to disparities and favoritism. A lack of transparency can breed distrust among the populace, undermining the legitimacy of the government.

  1. Vulnerability to Corruption and Mismanagement

Monopolies on essential resources can create an environment ripe for corruption and mismanagement. When a single entity holds all the power, there is a higher risk of graft, bribery, and nepotism. Scarce resources may be disproportionately distributed, benefitting those with connections to the government while leaving others in dire straits. This not only undermines social cohesion but also reinforces societal inequality.

While the idea of a government controlling all means of survival might be rooted in good intentions, the historical and practical implications suggest caution is warranted. Striking a balance between governmental oversight and individual autonomy is crucial to safeguarding democratic values, encouraging innovation, and promoting a thriving society. It is imperative for societies to learn from past mistakes and adopt systems that prioritize transparency, accountability, and a diversified approach to essential resource management. By doing so, we can mitigate the potential dangers of unchecked government control and pave the way for a more equitable and prosperous future.

Welcome to Peoplez Newz: Your Voice, Your News!

Hello and Welcome to Peoplez Newz!

We are thrilled to have you join our community. In a world where media often seems to be controlled by a few, we’ve set out on a mission to provide a platform where real news and authentic voices come together. At Peoplez Newz, we believe in the power of community, transparency, and the freedom to share information that truly matters.

Our Vision: At the core of Peoplez Newz is a vision to foster a sense of togetherness and connection among people from all walks of life. We believe that everyone’s perspective is important, and every story deserves to be heard. Our platform is designed to empower you, the members, to become active participants in shaping the news landscape. By contributing, engaging, and sharing your thoughts, you’re not just consuming news – you’re creating it!

Your Voice Matters: We are excited to introduce you to a unique feature of Peoplez Newz. When you click on the menu, you’ll find an option to write and publish your very own blogs. Whether it’s a personal experience, an insightful analysis, or an in-depth exploration of a topic close to your heart, your words have a home here. We believe that collectively, we can bring diverse perspectives and valuable insights to the forefront of conversations.

Breaking Free from Traditional Boundaries: Peoplez Newz isn’t just a news site; it’s a community built on the foundations of social media software. We’ve taken inspiration from platforms like Facebook to ensure that communication is seamless and effortless. Connect with like-minded individuals, share your thoughts, comment on articles, and engage in meaningful discussions – all within a familiar and user-friendly environment.

Why Peoplez Newz is Different:

  1. Authentic News: Say goodbye to sensationalism and misinformation. Peoplez Newz is committed to providing well-researched, unbiased, and trustworthy news articles that prioritize accuracy above all else.
  2. Community-Driven: Our community is at the heart of everything we do. We encourage you to actively participate, share your opinions, and engage in constructive conversations that expand your horizons.
  3. Your Platform, Your Rules: We respect your voice and your choices. Express yourself without fear of censorship, and embrace the freedom to share your unique perspective with the world.
  4. Easy Communication: Thanks to our social media-inspired design, you can connect with fellow members effortlessly. Stay informed, exchange ideas, and build relationships in a user-friendly and intuitive environment.

Get Started: Join us today in redefining the way news is created and consumed. Click on the menu/community feed and sign up, explore the options, and let your creativity flow. Write your own blogs, comment on articles, and be an active part of the Peoplez Newz community.

We can’t wait to see your contributions and watch our community grow. Welcome to Peoplez Newz, where your voice matters, and the news is truly in your hands!

Together, let’s make a difference.

Sincerely,

Darin Andrews

Founder, Peoplez Newz

Governor Ron DeSantis’ Presidential Bid: A Risky Gamble for Florida and the GOP

In the fast-approaching 2024 presidential race, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida is poised to announce his bid, stepping into a high-stakes political arena alongside fellow Republican contenders, including former President Donald Trump. However, many ardent Trump supporters, who view DeSantis as an invaluable figure in Florida, perceive this move as ill-advised. Concerns are mounting over who would lead Florida if DeSantis were to become President, while others worry that his campaign could cause damage to the Republican Party. In this blog post, we delve into the potential ramifications of DeSantis’ presidential ambitions and assess the challenges he may face.

A Precarious Gamble:

It is not without reason that some observers view Governor DeSantis’ decision to challenge Donald Trump as a monumental gamble. Trump’s dominance within the Republican Party remains substantial, with polling indicating a lead of 30 to 40 points over other contenders. Failing to secure victory against the former President could be detrimental to DeSantis’ political career, relegating him to the same fate as the ill-fated Jeb Bush. The ramifications of such a defeat might reverberate far into the future, effectively erasing any prospects for a resurgence in 2028 or beyond.

   

The Trump Factor:

One of the primary obstacles standing in DeSantis’ path is the enduring popularity of Donald Trump. Despite facing multiple court cases and controversies, Trump’s appeal has continued to grow, seemingly transcending traditional political affiliations. In contrast, many individuals remain uncertain about what DeSantis truly represents and what sets him apart from Trump. Although he secured a resounding victory in Florida’s gubernatorial race, anecdotal evidence from recent visits to the state suggests that challenging Trump might not be met with widespread approval. Instead, some locals express the sentiment that DeSantis should bide his time and consider contesting the presidency in 2028.

A Fractured GOP:

Defeating Donald Trump could have unintended consequences for the Republican Party as a whole. The GOP already grapples with internal divisions, and a failed attempt by DeSantis to unite the various factions might further fracture the party’s base. Such divisions could significantly undermine the party’s chances in the general election, potentially playing into the hands of the Democratic Party. Therefore, DeSantis must confront the challenge of not only surpassing Trump’s overwhelming popularity but also preventing the GOP from descending into disarray.

While acknowledging the fallibility of personal predictions, it appears that Governor Ron DeSantis’ entry into the 2024 presidential race presents a significant risk. Donald Trump’s commanding lead within the Republican Party, coupled with potential damage to the GOP’s unity, casts doubt on DeSantis’ chances of success. Moreover, the outcome of this gamble could determine the trajectory of his political career, potentially limiting his future prospects. Only time will reveal whether DeSantis can close the gap and overcome the formidable challenges he faces, uniting the Republican Party and mounting a viable challenge against the Democrats. For now, however, the road to victory seems like a distant and uncertain prospect.

US Military struggles to recruit for second straight year under the Biden administration

The United States military is facing a recruiting crisis. Despite the fact that the country spends more on defense than any other nation in the world, the military is having a hard time finding new recruits to fill its ranks.j

There are several reasons for this recruiting crisis. One of the main reasons is the improving economy. With the unemployment rate at historic lows, many young people are choosing to pursue other career paths instead of joining the military. In addition, the military is competing with the private sector for top talent, making it difficult to attract and retain skilled individuals.

Another factor contributing to the recruiting crisis is the changing attitudes of young people towards the military. Unlike previous generations, many young people today are not as willing to serve their country through military service. There are several reasons for this, including the ongoing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the negative stereotypes associated with military service.

Finally, the military is also facing a demographic challenge. With the aging of the Baby Boomer generation, there are fewer young people available to serve in the military. This is further compounded by the fact that the military has strict age and health requirements, which can disqualify many potential recruits.

To address this recruiting crisis, the military has implemented several measures to attract new recruits. These include offering signing bonuses and increased pay, expanding educational and training opportunities, and increasing the use of social media and other digital platforms to reach potential recruits.

Despite these efforts, the recruiting crisis is far from over. The military must continue to adapt to changing attitudes and demographics if it hopes to maintain its readiness and capability in the face of growing threats around the world. This will require innovative thinking and a willingness to embrace new approaches to recruiting and retention. Only then can the military attract the next generation of warriors and meet the challenges of the future.