How the Democrats can rig the 2024 Primaries to beat Trump

It’s no secret that the DNC rigs its primaries for whom the elite in control want to run the country, as they did with Bernie vs. Hillary in the 2016 elections. So, what are they up to this election to ensure that Donald Trump doesn’t get back to the White House? I think I have that answer.

A Tampa attorney, Michael Steinberg, represented himself in federal court, accusing the Florida Democratic Party (FDP) of violating his voter rights by exclusively placing Joe Biden on their primary presidential ballot. Steinberg argued that excluding other candidates was “arbitrary and capricious.” The lawsuit names the FDP and Secretary of State Cord Byrd as defendants. The judge, Allen Winsor, intends to rule soon on whether the FDP’s decision is a “state action” requiring court intervention or an internal party matter. The FDP contends they followed their standard process, while Steinberg emphasizes the need for a clearer candidate selection process. The court decision is expected before overseas ballots for the March 19 primary are sent out on February 3.

What does this mean? It means the democrats are rigging the election against former President Donald Trump by freeing up Democrat voters to vote against Trump in the Primaries.

The question is, is this legal and how do we stop it? This is what we are going to find out with the Federal Judge in Florida.

However in New Hampshire National Committee’s rules committee told New Hampshire party leaders to “educate the public that January 23rd is a non-binding presidential preference event and is meaningless.” In a letter to Chairman Ray Buckley.

They are hinting to their voters to ignore the Democrats primary and vote against Trump for say Nicki Hailey or Vivek. Doing so would likely give one of them the win if they can get enough to participate. Trump holds a substantial lead in all polls, so its unclear if they can pull that off. But the fact it is a possibility, we have to counter their attack on our process to ensure we get what the voters want. DONALD TRUMP!

So if the Florida case does not side with the defendant, then the RNC must do what is right and cancel the primary and give Trump the nomination as he is the clear front runner. Not doing so sets the stage for another steal, and this election is the most important in our history.

The Vulnerabilities of Electronic Voting: Why Hand Counting Is the Only Way!

In an era where technology influences almost every aspect of our lives, the introduction of electronic voting systems has garnered significant attention. Proponents argue that electronic voting can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the voting process. However, it’s essential to consider the potential vulnerabilities of electronic voting systems, particularly in terms of software manipulation. In this blog, we’ll explore the risks associated with electronic voting and discuss why hand counting remains a more reliable option.

In the image below is an algorithm that creates an object that destroys itself after execution;

Electronic Voting Vulnerabilities

  • Software Manipulation: Electronic voting systems rely heavily on software to record and tally votes. While these systems are designed with security measures, they are not immune to vulnerabilities. Hackers, both internal and external, can exploit these vulnerabilities to manipulate the results. Instances of software manipulation have been reported, raising concerns about the integrity of electronic voting.
  • Lack of Transparency: Electronic voting often lacks the transparency of traditional paper ballots. Voters may not fully understand the inner workings of the software used, making it challenging to ensure the accuracy of their votes. In contrast, hand-counted paper ballots offer transparency as voters can see their choices physically marked and counted.
  • Software Bugs and Glitches: Software, no matter how well-designed, is prone to bugs and glitches. These technical issues can disrupt the voting process, leading to erroneous results or even lost votes. A single software glitch can have a significant impact on an election, potentially changing its outcome.
  • Inadequate Verification: Electronic voting systems typically provide a digital record of the vote. However, it’s difficult for voters to verify the accuracy of their votes within the system. Paper ballots, on the other hand, allow voters to visually confirm their choices and ensure their intentions are accurately recorded.
  • Centralization: Many electronic voting systems are centralized, meaning that votes are collected and processed in one location. This centralization can create a single point of failure, making the system more susceptible to hacking or manipulation.

The Benefits of Hand Counting

  • Transparency and Trust: Hand counting offers a high level of transparency. Observers can witness the entire process, ensuring that votes are counted accurately and without interference. This transparency builds trust in the electoral process.
  • Voter Verification: With paper ballots, voters can directly verify their choices, reducing the chances of miscounts or errors. This tactile experience reassures voters that their voices are heard.
  • Resilience to Technical Failures: Hand counting is not reliant on electronic systems, making it more resilient to technical failures, such as power outages or system crashes. This ensures the voting process can continue without interruptions.
  • Paper Trail: Paper ballots provide a tangible paper trail, allowing for recounts and audits if necessary. In electronic voting, the lack of a paper trail can make it challenging to verify the accuracy of the results.


While electronic voting systems offer convenience and the potential for increased efficiency, they also pose significant risks due to software vulnerabilities and a lack of transparency. Hand counting, with its long history of reliability and trustworthiness, remains a more secure and transparent method for ensuring the integrity of elections. Ultimately, the decision to adopt electronic voting or stick with traditional hand counting should prioritize the security and accuracy of the democratic process, maintaining public trust in the electoral system.

How Biden’s corruption in Ukraine could cost American lives

corruption involving high-ranking officials are always concerning, and when they involve a sitting U.S. President, they take on a gravity of their own. Recently, there have corruption involving President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in relation to Ukraine. While these  are still under investigation, it’s crucial to explore the  scenario in which such actions could escalate to a point where they might contribute to the U.S. going to war.

Destabilizing U.S. Foreign Policy

Corruption  against a U.S. President can undermine the credibility of U.S. foreign policy. If evidence of corruption involving President Biden and Ukraine prove true, it could severely damage America’s reputation on the international stage. Foreign governments may become hesitant to engage with the U.S., and allies could lose trust in the U.S. leadership. In such a climate of uncertainty and mistrust, conflicts are more likely to escalate.

Diplomatic Fallout

A credible corruption scandal involving the U.S. President could lead to diplomatic fallout between the U.S. and other nations. In the case of Ukraine, if evidence were to emerge implicating President Biden in corrupt dealings, it might strain the relationship between the U.S. and Ukraine, a country already dealing with geopolitical tensions with Russia. Diplomatic tensions could escalate and result in misunderstandings, disputes, or even sanctions that increase the likelihood of armed conflict.

Fanning the Flames of Disinformation

Corruption, particularly against a sitting President, can become fodder for disinformation campaigns. Hostile actors, both foreign and domestic, may exploit these claims to fuel division and chaos within the U.S. Disinformation campaigns can exacerbate existing tensions, making it more challenging to maintain stable international relations and increasing the risk of conflict.

Shifting Domestic Priorities

A major corruption scandal involving a sitting President can consume a significant amount of government and media attention. This focus on domestic issues can lead to a redirection of resources away from foreign policy and national security priorities. A weakened foreign policy apparatus may inadvertently embolden potential adversaries, making it more difficult to deter aggression and avoid conflict.

Heightened Tensions with Russia

Given Ukraine’s strategic location and its ongoing conflict with Russia, allegations of corruption involving the U.S. President could escalate tensions between the U.S. and Russia. Moscow has a history of exploiting divisions within Western nations to further its interests. In this scenario, Russia could seize the opportunity to assert its influence in Ukraine and the broader region, potentially leading to a dangerous standoff between the two nuclear-armed powers.


While corruption involving President Biden and Ukraine are still under investigation, it’s crucial to understand the potential consequences such actions could have on U.S. foreign policy and international relations. Destabilizing foreign policy, diplomatic fallout, disinformation, shifts in domestic priorities, and heightened tensions with Russia are all factors that could contribute to a scenario where the U.S. becomes embroiled in a conflict. It is incumbent upon all stakeholders to ensure that any allegations of corruption are thoroughly and impartially investigated to maintain the U.S.’s standing as a responsible global actor and to avoid the gravest of outcomes: war.

Peoplez Newz

The Unprecedented Power of Unity: The Impact of a Nationwide Labor Strike by Essential and Non-Essential Workers

Imagine a scenario where essential and non-essential workers from every sector across the nation unite in an unprecedented labor strike, demanding a change in the trajectory of their country. Such an event would undoubtedly be historic, sending shockwaves through every aspect of society, economics, and politics. While this is purely hypothetical, exploring the potential consequences of such a massive labor strike can provide valuable insights into the role of labor movements in shaping a nation’s future.

  1. The Scale of the Movement

The sheer magnitude of a nationwide labor strike involving both essential and non-essential workers would be unlike anything witnessed before. Essential workers, such as healthcare professionals, first responders, and essential service providers, would amplify the impact of the strike due to their critical roles in society. Non-essential workers, on the other hand, would add weight to the movement by disrupting various industries like manufacturing, retail, and tech.

  1. Economic Disruption

The economic consequences of such a strike would be profound. With essential services grinding to a halt and non-essential industries paralyzed, the country’s economy would experience a significant downturn. Stock markets could plummet, businesses might suffer severe losses, and unemployment rates could skyrocket. This economic turmoil would exert immense pressure on policymakers to address the workers’ demands swiftly.

  1. Political Pressure

The strike would place unparalleled political pressure on government institutions. Elected officials would face a crisis of legitimacy, as they must navigate the demands of millions of citizens who are deeply dissatisfied with the status quo. This could result in increased transparency, accountability, and a heightened focus on addressing the issues that led to such a widespread labor movement.

  1. Social Solidarity

A strike of this magnitude would likely foster a sense of solidarity among the general population. Neighbors would support each other, community networks would strengthen, and people would come together to address the challenges posed by the strike. Such unity might lead to a resurgence in community-driven initiatives and a reevaluation of societal values.

  1. Policy Changes

One of the most significant potential outcomes of such a strike would be substantial policy changes. Workers might demand improvements in labor conditions, fair wages, healthcare access, and social safety nets. The government, pressured by the scale of the movement, could be compelled to enact reforms addressing these issues, potentially resulting in lasting changes that benefit workers and society as a whole.

  1. Global Implications

A nationwide labor strike on this scale would not go unnoticed on the global stage. It could inspire similar movements in other countries, fostering a wave of labor activism worldwide. Additionally, international economic markets and trade could be significantly affected, influencing global supply chains and geopolitical dynamics.


What would we demand change ?


  1. AI and Automation Regulation:
    • Implement strict regulations to halt the widespread automation of non-life threatening jobs, ensuring that technology does not displace human workers without adequate safeguards and alternative employment opportunities.
  2. National Minimum Wage Adjusted for Inflation and Cost of Living:
    • Establish a national minimum wage that is periodically adjusted for inflation and the local cost of living. This ensures that every worker can earn a fair wage that keeps pace with economic realities.
  3. Healthcare Cost Controls:
    • Enforce caps on healthcare services, including life-saving prescriptions and medical procedures, to prevent exorbitant pricing that can leave individuals and families financially devastated in their pursuit of essential medical care.
  4. Campaign Finance and Lobbying Reform:
    • Enact comprehensive campaign finance reform to limit the influence of money in politics. This includes strict regulations on campaign contributions, independent expenditures, and dark money, as well as the elimination of corporate and special interest PACs.
    • Implement rigorous restrictions on lobbying activities to prevent undue influence on lawmakers and ensure transparency and accountability in the lobbying process.
  5. Conflict of Interest Regulations:
    • Prohibit elected officials, government employees, and those in influential public positions from actively trading stocks or participating in investment activities that could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine the public’s trust in government decision-making.
  6. Worker Protections :
    • Strengthen workers’ rights  and collectively bargain for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions, ensuring that employees have a strong voice in their workplaces.
  7. Affordable Education and Student Loan Reform:
    • Make higher education more accessible by reducing the cost of tuition and expanding financial aid programs. Implement reforms to address the student loan debt crisis.
  8. Criminal Justice Reform:
    • Overhaul the criminal justice system to prioritize rehabilitation and reduce mass incarceration. This includes reevaluating sentencing guidelines, ending the privatization of prisons, and investing in alternative solutions to incarceration.
  9. Affordable Housing and Rent Controls:
    • Implement measures to ensure affordable housing for all, including rent controls, affordable housing initiatives, and incentives for the construction of affordable housing unit.

These demands reflect a vision of a more just and equitable society, addressing economic disparities, political corruption, and social injustices. While achieving these goals may require substantial effort and legislative changes, they represent a path toward a more inclusive and responsive government that serves the interests of all its citizens.


While a hypothetical nationwide labor strike involving both essential and non-essential workers is a thought experiment, it underscores the potential power of collective action in shaping the direction of a country. Such an event would undoubtedly be a catalyst for change, forcing society, politics, and the economy to adapt to the demands of millions. Although the consequences could be challenging and disruptive in the short term, the long-term impact could be transformative, leading to a more equitable and responsive society. It serves as a reminder of the profound influence that organized labor and collective action can have in shaping the future of nations.


The Unconventional 2024 Presidential Ticket of Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy

In the realm of American politics, surprises are not unheard of. But imagine a scenario where two prominent figures from opposite ends of the political spectrum come together to create an unprecedented alliance. In the upcoming 2024 election, there’s a growing buzz about the possibility of former President Donald Trump and the late Robert F. Kennedy’s legacy uniting on a single ticket. While this might sound like a political fantasy, it’s worth exploring the potential impact of such an unconventional partnership.

A Fusion of Legacies

Donald Trump, the maverick businessman turned 45th President of the United States, and Robert F. Kennedy, a revered Democratic senator and icon of social justice, represent seemingly opposing ideals. Trump’s “America First” policies and brash communication style sharply contrast with Kennedy’s advocacy for civil rights, healthcare reform, and economic equality. However, beneath these differences lie elements that could bridge the gap between their respective followings.

Kennedy’s legacy continues to inspire those who champion social justice and progressive policies. His commitment to fighting poverty, racial discrimination, and advocating for healthcare as a fundamental right could resonate with a wide spectrum of voters, including younger generations seeking change. On the other hand, Trump’s appeal to his base through his economic policies, nationalist stance, and unfiltered communication has garnered him a dedicated following that remains loyal.

A Unifying Vision

The idea of Trump and Kennedy joining forces might seem far-fetched, but in today’s increasingly polarized political landscape, it’s not entirely implausible. The key to their potential success lies in finding common ground and presenting a unifying vision for the country. A hypothetical campaign could focus on revitalizing American industries, investing in infrastructure, and addressing the needs of working-class Americans, thereby bridging their disparate policy perspectives.

Challenges and Opportunities

Undoubtedly, this unconventional partnership would face significant challenges. The ideological differences between Trump and Kennedy could prove insurmountable to some voters, and the media would scrutinize the collaboration intensely. However, there’s also an opportunity for them to transcend these challenges by emphasizing a shared commitment to American values, progress, and the wellbeing of the nation.

Impact on the Political Landscape

A Trump-Kennedy ticket could have a profound impact on the 2024 election and reshape the political landscape. Their alliance could potentially attract a broad coalition of voters who are disenchanted with traditional party lines and are hungry for innovative solutions. Independents, moderate Democrats, and even some Republicans might find the partnership intriguing, creating a formidable force that transcends party loyalties.

While the prospect of Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy teaming up for the 2024 election might seem like a long shot, the dynamics of modern politics have proven that anything is possible. If they were to find common ground and tap into their respective bases of support, they could create an electoral phenomenon that defies conventional wisdom. Regardless of the outcome, the mere consideration of such an alliance sparks conversations about unity, bipartisanship, and the transformative potential of American politics.

Why Donald Trump will get convicted in one of the 4 Indictments

I told my brother last year, that there is zero chance of Trump getting back into power given what we witnessed in the 2020 election.

However here is what they are doing to ensure Trump doesn’t get into office;

Get as many Indictments as possible so the odds of a conviction are greater than having only one Indictment.

The concept of a fair trial is a cornerstone of justice in democratic societies. It ensures that every individual, regardless of their social status or public image, is entitled to a legal process free from bias, prejudice, and manipulation. The topic of whether former President Donald Trump can receive a fair trial has been a subject of debate and controversy. In this blog, we’ll explore the complexities surrounding this issue and consider the factors that could impact the fairness of a trial involving a prominent public figure.

The Challenges of Public Perception

  1. Pretrial Publicity: High-profile cases involving public figures often garner significant media attention, and the extensive coverage can shape public opinions even before the trial begins. This can lead to difficulties in selecting an impartial jury and create an environment where jurors may already have formed opinions about the case.
  2. Confirmation Bias: People tend to interpret information in a way that aligns with their existing beliefs. In the case of Trump, supporters may see him as unfairly targeted, while critics might view him as being above the law. This bias can impact how evidence is perceived and interpreted during the trial.
  3. Polarization: The intense political polarization in society can make it challenging to find jurors who haven’t already taken a stance on the case. This can further complicate the selection of an unbiased jury.

Legal Challenges

  1. Legal Precedent: Previous statements or actions of a public figure might influence the legal process. In Trump’s case, some argue that his past rhetoric and behavior could be used against him, potentially affecting the objectivity of the trial.
  2. Jurisdictional Considerations: The jurisdiction in which a trial takes place can influence its fairness. Some regions might have a higher concentration of individuals with strong opinions about Trump, which could impact the neutrality of the trial.
  3. Security Concerns: The security requirements for a high-profile trial can be substantial, potentially affecting the normal operations of a courthouse and creating an environment that is less conducive to a fair trial.

But remember this Juror in one of Trump’s Indictment?

This is Juror Emily Kohrs from Georgia that was apart of the grand jury. Remember her odd 15 minute interview where she seems so excited to be the one to hand Trump his subpoena?

She is the very reason the odds against Trump getting a conviction in one of these Indictments, and the radical left knows this. The sheer excitement to be apart of history will get a jury to convict regardless of evidence.

This is why Trumps only hope is for the Supreme Court to intervein and that is also not likely given they were silent on the 2020 election anomalies. The question will be where do Trumps supporters go from here?

Leave us your opinion in the comments.


AI Compares Electronic Vote Counting and the Risks vs Human Placebo Counting

I asked AI to tell me the risks involved with electronic vote counting and this is what it responded with;


In recent years, technological advancements have revolutionized many aspects of our lives, including the way we conduct elections. Electronic vote counting systems have gained popularity due to their efficiency, accuracy, and potential to streamline the electoral process. However, like any technology, these systems are not immune to vulnerabilities. This blog delves into the potential ways electronic vote counting could be manipulated, shedding light on the importance of robust safeguards to ensure the integrity of our democratic processes.

Understanding Electronic Vote Counting

Electronic vote counting involves the use of computers and software to tally votes cast by citizens during an election. This technology offers several advantages, such as speedier results, reduced human error, and improved accessibility for voters with disabilities. It is essential to note that many countries have implemented electronic vote counting systems with strong security measures in place, aiming to safeguard against manipulation.

Potential Vulnerabilities

While electronic vote counting systems come with built-in security features, they are not immune to potential vulnerabilities. Here are some hypothetical scenarios that could be exploited if adequate safeguards are not in place:

  1. Malicious Software: Hackers could develop and inject malicious software into vote counting systems, altering the outcome of the election. This could include changing vote tallies, modifying candidate information, or even deleting votes altogether.
  2. Insider Threats: Individuals with access to the vote counting systems, such as election officials or technicians, could abuse their positions of trust to manipulate results. This could involve altering the software, tampering with data, or introducing vulnerabilities.
  3. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks: Attackers could overwhelm the electronic vote counting infrastructure with a DDoS attack, disrupting the system’s functionality and causing delays or inaccuracies in counting votes.
  4. Social Engineering: By manipulating individuals involved in the process through tactics such as phishing, hackers could gain unauthorized access to the system, potentially altering vote counts.
  5. Vulnerable Hardware: If the hardware components used in the vote counting systems have vulnerabilities, attackers could exploit these weaknesses to gain unauthorized access or manipulate results.
  6. Data Interception: If communication between different components of the electronic vote counting system is not properly encrypted, attackers could intercept and alter the data being transmitted.

Safeguards and Countermeasures

While the potential vulnerabilities mentioned above might raise concerns, it’s important to emphasize that many electronic vote counting systems have robust safeguards in place to prevent such scenarios. These measures include:

  1. Encryption: Implementing strong encryption protocols for data transmission and storage to prevent unauthorized access or data manipulation.
  2. Multi-Factor Authentication: Requiring multiple authentication factors for individuals accessing the system to prevent unauthorized personnel from tampering with results.
  3. Regular Audits: Conducting routine audits of the system’s software and hardware to detect any potential vulnerabilities or anomalies.
  4. Paper Trail: Many electronic vote counting systems are designed to generate paper receipts or backup records, allowing for manual verification and auditing in case of discrepancies.
  5. Isolation and Air Gapping: Physically isolating the vote counting systems from external networks and the internet to prevent remote attacks and unauthorized access.
  6. Ethical Hackers and Penetration Testing: Employing ethical hackers to identify potential vulnerabilities through penetration testing, enabling the system to be strengthened against potential attacks.


Electronic vote counting has the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the electoral process. However, acknowledging the potential vulnerabilities is crucial to ensuring the integrity of elections. By implementing strong security measures, regular audits, and engaging in ongoing research to address emerging threats, we can minimize the risks associated with electronic vote counting and maintain the trust of citizens in the democratic process. It’s a delicate balance between embracing technology’s benefits and safeguarding against its potential drawbacks.


Then I asked AI the benefits of using a placebo style vote counting system using humans and this is what it responded with;

In the digital age, technology has transformed numerous aspects of our lives, including the way we conduct elections. However, as we explore new avenues to modernize voting systems, it’s essential to critically examine the potential risks and benefits. In this blog, we will delve into the merits of human vote counting using blind placebo systems as a means to protect the integrity of our democratic processes.

The Importance of Trust

Trust is the bedrock of any democracy. Citizens must believe that their votes are accurately counted and that the electoral process is free from manipulation. While electronic vote counting systems offer efficiency, they can also raise concerns about potential vulnerabilities and manipulation. Human vote counting, on the other hand, offers a tangible and transparent process that citizens can readily understand and trust.

Human Vote Counting: A Transparent Process

  1. Transparency: Human vote counting is a transparent process that can be observed by representatives from various political parties and civil society groups. This transparency ensures that there are multiple sets of eyes on the process, reducing the chances of foul play.
  2. Accessibility: Human vote counting provides accessibility for citizens who may not be technologically inclined or have concerns about the accuracy of electronic systems. It ensures that every voter’s voice is heard and accounted for.
  3. Trustworthiness: The human element adds a level of trustworthiness to the process. Individuals involved in vote counting are accountable for their actions, reducing the risk of tampering or manipulation.

Blind Placebo Systems: Enhancing Transparency and Security

Blind placebo systems, which involve mixing dummy or placebo votes with actual votes, can further enhance the transparency and security of human vote counting. Here’s how:

  1. Deterrence: The presence of placebo votes makes it challenging for anyone attempting to manipulate the results. Attackers will be unable to identify which votes are genuine and which are placebos, dissuading them from attempting to alter the outcome.
  2. Detection: Any attempts at fraud or manipulation become easier to detect when comparing the actual results to the expected outcomes based on the placebo mix. This method creates a safety net against irregularities.
  3. Auditing: Placebo systems facilitate post-election audits, making it easier to spot discrepancies between the actual vote count and the expected outcome. This increases accountability and helps maintain the accuracy of the electoral process.

Protecting Democracy Through Accountability

The human vote counting process, augmented by blind placebo systems, places a strong emphasis on accountability and transparency. These systems ensure that the integrity of the election remains intact while minimizing the potential for manipulation. Here are some ways these approaches protect democracy:

  1. Community Involvement: Human vote counting encourages community involvement in the democratic process. Citizens can actively participate in monitoring and safeguarding the accuracy of the count.
  2. Reduced Vulnerabilities: By relying on the human element rather than complex electronic systems, the risk of cyberattacks and software vulnerabilities is significantly reduced.
  3. Election Integrity: The credibility of elections is upheld, fostering confidence among citizens that their voices matter and that the democratic process is fair and transparent.


As we navigate the intersection of technology and democracy, it’s crucial to prioritize the integrity of our electoral systems. While electronic vote counting has its merits, human vote counting with blind placebo systems offers a transparent, accessible, and trustworthy approach to protect the core values of democracy. By embracing these methods, we can ensure that our elections remain a true reflection of the will of the people and that citizens can place their trust in the democratic process.


My Conclusion;

Given the two AI generated answers, it is a clear cut winner to bring back human vote counting to ensure integrity in our elections. As long as we use electronic and mail in voting, we will never have a fair election that people can trust. I hope we can make this a major topic before the 2024 election as our democracy is at stake.

Governor Ron DeSantis’ Presidential Bid: A Risky Gamble for Florida and the GOP

In the fast-approaching 2024 presidential race, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida is poised to announce his bid, stepping into a high-stakes political arena alongside fellow Republican contenders, including former President Donald Trump. However, many ardent Trump supporters, who view DeSantis as an invaluable figure in Florida, perceive this move as ill-advised. Concerns are mounting over who would lead Florida if DeSantis were to become President, while others worry that his campaign could cause damage to the Republican Party. In this blog post, we delve into the potential ramifications of DeSantis’ presidential ambitions and assess the challenges he may face.

A Precarious Gamble:

It is not without reason that some observers view Governor DeSantis’ decision to challenge Donald Trump as a monumental gamble. Trump’s dominance within the Republican Party remains substantial, with polling indicating a lead of 30 to 40 points over other contenders. Failing to secure victory against the former President could be detrimental to DeSantis’ political career, relegating him to the same fate as the ill-fated Jeb Bush. The ramifications of such a defeat might reverberate far into the future, effectively erasing any prospects for a resurgence in 2028 or beyond.


The Trump Factor:

One of the primary obstacles standing in DeSantis’ path is the enduring popularity of Donald Trump. Despite facing multiple court cases and controversies, Trump’s appeal has continued to grow, seemingly transcending traditional political affiliations. In contrast, many individuals remain uncertain about what DeSantis truly represents and what sets him apart from Trump. Although he secured a resounding victory in Florida’s gubernatorial race, anecdotal evidence from recent visits to the state suggests that challenging Trump might not be met with widespread approval. Instead, some locals express the sentiment that DeSantis should bide his time and consider contesting the presidency in 2028.

A Fractured GOP:

Defeating Donald Trump could have unintended consequences for the Republican Party as a whole. The GOP already grapples with internal divisions, and a failed attempt by DeSantis to unite the various factions might further fracture the party’s base. Such divisions could significantly undermine the party’s chances in the general election, potentially playing into the hands of the Democratic Party. Therefore, DeSantis must confront the challenge of not only surpassing Trump’s overwhelming popularity but also preventing the GOP from descending into disarray.

While acknowledging the fallibility of personal predictions, it appears that Governor Ron DeSantis’ entry into the 2024 presidential race presents a significant risk. Donald Trump’s commanding lead within the Republican Party, coupled with potential damage to the GOP’s unity, casts doubt on DeSantis’ chances of success. Moreover, the outcome of this gamble could determine the trajectory of his political career, potentially limiting his future prospects. Only time will reveal whether DeSantis can close the gap and overcome the formidable challenges he faces, uniting the Republican Party and mounting a viable challenge against the Democrats. For now, however, the road to victory seems like a distant and uncertain prospect.

Democrats lowering the bar to attack Donald Trump, just may be setting their own traps

The Democrats may be falling into a trap with their repeated attempts to charge former President Donald Trump with various offenses. While the intentions of the Democrats may be to hold Trump accountable for his actions, there are some who believe that their actions are actually lowering the bar for what can be done to a former president. In fact, some argue that these actions may end up resulting in many Democrats being arrested for similar offenses in the future.

The argument goes like this: if Democrats succeed in charging Trump with various offenses, it sets a precedent for future political leaders to be charged with similar offenses after they leave office. This means that Democrats who engage in similar behavior could also be held accountable in the future. In other words, the Democrats are setting themselves up for a trap by lowering the bar for what can be done to a former president.

One example of this is the ongoing impeachment trial of Donald Trump. The impeachment is based on the allegation that Trump incited the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. If Trump is convicted, it could set a precedent for future presidents to be impeached for similar offenses, including incitement of violence.

However, this could also result in Democrats being held accountable for inciting violence in the future. For example, if a Democratic president were to encourage protests that turn violent, they could be impeached and removed from office for incitement of violence. This could potentially result in a lot of Democrats being arrested and charged for similar offenses.

Another example is the ongoing investigation into the Trump Organization’s finances. If Trump is found guilty of financial crimes, it could set a precedent for future presidents to be investigated for similar offenses. This means that Democrats who engage in similar behavior could also be investigated and charged in the future.

While the Democrats may be motivated by a desire to hold Trump accountable for his actions, they may be unwittingly setting themselves up for future legal troubles. By lowering the bar for what can be done to a former president, they may end up creating a dangerous precedent that could be used against them in the future.

In conclusion, the theory that the Democrats are falling into a trap with all the charges on Trump is a valid one. While their intentions may be noble, their actions may end up creating a dangerous precedent that could be used against them in the future. It remains to be seen whether the Democrats will be able to navigate this trap successfully, but it is clear that they need to be careful about the precedent they are setting.

Peoplez Newz

Nancy Pelosi & the FBI will surely face a fierce investigation over recently released evidence over the Jan. 6th riots

With Republicans taking control of the house in a few short weeks, Nancy Pelosi and heads of the FBI should be very worried as subpoena powers shift.

We have been through 4 years of harsh interrogations and non-stop attacks on the former president Donald Trump, with several Trump associates going to prison mostly over lying to congress. Given how low they set the bar for a conviction, Nancy and her squad should be very worried as stacks of evidence awaits to be answered by them.

Some of her biggest stunts include 2 failed attempts to remove Trump from power, and the latest evidence released by Twitter, showing the governments involvement in suppressing factual news that could have altered the election.

House Republicans have also gathered a trove of text and email messages, proving Nancy was directly involved with denying resources that “time after time”, as  stated by security officials responsible for the failed January 6th raid of the capital.

Those internal discussions were just made public on Wednesday December 21st by Republicans Jim Jordan, Rodney Davis, Jim Banks, Troy Nehls & Kelly Armstrong. They stated that this evidence was deliberately ignored by the democrats leading the investigation.

Nancy’s intended failures deserves it’s own investigation, for dereliction of duty along with anyone involved with decision making.

Republican law makers will be under extreme pressure to hold everyone accountable, or face losing their seats.