AI Compares Electronic Vote Counting and the Risks vs Human Placebo Counting

I asked AI to tell me the risks involved with electronic vote counting and this is what it responded with;


In recent years, technological advancements have revolutionized many aspects of our lives, including the way we conduct elections. Electronic vote counting systems have gained popularity due to their efficiency, accuracy, and potential to streamline the electoral process. However, like any technology, these systems are not immune to vulnerabilities. This blog delves into the potential ways electronic vote counting could be manipulated, shedding light on the importance of robust safeguards to ensure the integrity of our democratic processes.

Understanding Electronic Vote Counting

Electronic vote counting involves the use of computers and software to tally votes cast by citizens during an election. This technology offers several advantages, such as speedier results, reduced human error, and improved accessibility for voters with disabilities. It is essential to note that many countries have implemented electronic vote counting systems with strong security measures in place, aiming to safeguard against manipulation.

Potential Vulnerabilities

While electronic vote counting systems come with built-in security features, they are not immune to potential vulnerabilities. Here are some hypothetical scenarios that could be exploited if adequate safeguards are not in place:

  1. Malicious Software: Hackers could develop and inject malicious software into vote counting systems, altering the outcome of the election. This could include changing vote tallies, modifying candidate information, or even deleting votes altogether.
  2. Insider Threats: Individuals with access to the vote counting systems, such as election officials or technicians, could abuse their positions of trust to manipulate results. This could involve altering the software, tampering with data, or introducing vulnerabilities.
  3. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks: Attackers could overwhelm the electronic vote counting infrastructure with a DDoS attack, disrupting the system’s functionality and causing delays or inaccuracies in counting votes.
  4. Social Engineering: By manipulating individuals involved in the process through tactics such as phishing, hackers could gain unauthorized access to the system, potentially altering vote counts.
  5. Vulnerable Hardware: If the hardware components used in the vote counting systems have vulnerabilities, attackers could exploit these weaknesses to gain unauthorized access or manipulate results.
  6. Data Interception: If communication between different components of the electronic vote counting system is not properly encrypted, attackers could intercept and alter the data being transmitted.

Safeguards and Countermeasures

While the potential vulnerabilities mentioned above might raise concerns, it’s important to emphasize that many electronic vote counting systems have robust safeguards in place to prevent such scenarios. These measures include:

  1. Encryption: Implementing strong encryption protocols for data transmission and storage to prevent unauthorized access or data manipulation.
  2. Multi-Factor Authentication: Requiring multiple authentication factors for individuals accessing the system to prevent unauthorized personnel from tampering with results.
  3. Regular Audits: Conducting routine audits of the system’s software and hardware to detect any potential vulnerabilities or anomalies.
  4. Paper Trail: Many electronic vote counting systems are designed to generate paper receipts or backup records, allowing for manual verification and auditing in case of discrepancies.
  5. Isolation and Air Gapping: Physically isolating the vote counting systems from external networks and the internet to prevent remote attacks and unauthorized access.
  6. Ethical Hackers and Penetration Testing: Employing ethical hackers to identify potential vulnerabilities through penetration testing, enabling the system to be strengthened against potential attacks.


Electronic vote counting has the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the electoral process. However, acknowledging the potential vulnerabilities is crucial to ensuring the integrity of elections. By implementing strong security measures, regular audits, and engaging in ongoing research to address emerging threats, we can minimize the risks associated with electronic vote counting and maintain the trust of citizens in the democratic process. It’s a delicate balance between embracing technology’s benefits and safeguarding against its potential drawbacks.


Then I asked AI the benefits of using a placebo style vote counting system using humans and this is what it responded with;

In the digital age, technology has transformed numerous aspects of our lives, including the way we conduct elections. However, as we explore new avenues to modernize voting systems, it’s essential to critically examine the potential risks and benefits. In this blog, we will delve into the merits of human vote counting using blind placebo systems as a means to protect the integrity of our democratic processes.

The Importance of Trust

Trust is the bedrock of any democracy. Citizens must believe that their votes are accurately counted and that the electoral process is free from manipulation. While electronic vote counting systems offer efficiency, they can also raise concerns about potential vulnerabilities and manipulation. Human vote counting, on the other hand, offers a tangible and transparent process that citizens can readily understand and trust.

Human Vote Counting: A Transparent Process

  1. Transparency: Human vote counting is a transparent process that can be observed by representatives from various political parties and civil society groups. This transparency ensures that there are multiple sets of eyes on the process, reducing the chances of foul play.
  2. Accessibility: Human vote counting provides accessibility for citizens who may not be technologically inclined or have concerns about the accuracy of electronic systems. It ensures that every voter’s voice is heard and accounted for.
  3. Trustworthiness: The human element adds a level of trustworthiness to the process. Individuals involved in vote counting are accountable for their actions, reducing the risk of tampering or manipulation.

Blind Placebo Systems: Enhancing Transparency and Security

Blind placebo systems, which involve mixing dummy or placebo votes with actual votes, can further enhance the transparency and security of human vote counting. Here’s how:

  1. Deterrence: The presence of placebo votes makes it challenging for anyone attempting to manipulate the results. Attackers will be unable to identify which votes are genuine and which are placebos, dissuading them from attempting to alter the outcome.
  2. Detection: Any attempts at fraud or manipulation become easier to detect when comparing the actual results to the expected outcomes based on the placebo mix. This method creates a safety net against irregularities.
  3. Auditing: Placebo systems facilitate post-election audits, making it easier to spot discrepancies between the actual vote count and the expected outcome. This increases accountability and helps maintain the accuracy of the electoral process.

Protecting Democracy Through Accountability

The human vote counting process, augmented by blind placebo systems, places a strong emphasis on accountability and transparency. These systems ensure that the integrity of the election remains intact while minimizing the potential for manipulation. Here are some ways these approaches protect democracy:

  1. Community Involvement: Human vote counting encourages community involvement in the democratic process. Citizens can actively participate in monitoring and safeguarding the accuracy of the count.
  2. Reduced Vulnerabilities: By relying on the human element rather than complex electronic systems, the risk of cyberattacks and software vulnerabilities is significantly reduced.
  3. Election Integrity: The credibility of elections is upheld, fostering confidence among citizens that their voices matter and that the democratic process is fair and transparent.


As we navigate the intersection of technology and democracy, it’s crucial to prioritize the integrity of our electoral systems. While electronic vote counting has its merits, human vote counting with blind placebo systems offers a transparent, accessible, and trustworthy approach to protect the core values of democracy. By embracing these methods, we can ensure that our elections remain a true reflection of the will of the people and that citizens can place their trust in the democratic process.


My Conclusion;

Given the two AI generated answers, it is a clear cut winner to bring back human vote counting to ensure integrity in our elections. As long as we use electronic and mail in voting, we will never have a fair election that people can trust. I hope we can make this a major topic before the 2024 election as our democracy is at stake.

View Counter Icon 236 Total Views, 2 Views Today

The Peoplez Newz!


No comments yet